Insights & Rankings Compare
Compare ZIP codes side by side
Line up 2–5 ZIP codes and read the ZipVitals Score, both ranks, and every scoring domain against the same national scale. Descriptive of documented conditions — never a verdict on the people who live there.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ZipVitals ScoreComposite of 9 scoring domains | 42.99 Leads | 35.40 |
| National rankAmong ZIPs with a computed score | #24,383of 32,066 US ZIPs Leads | #29,231of 32,066 US ZIPs |
| State rankAmong ZIPs with a computed score | #303of 619 AL ZIPs | #855of 993 MO ZIPs |
| Metro rankAmong ZIPs with a computed score | Not in a metro area | Not in a metro area |
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ZipVitals Score | 42.99 Leads | 35.40 |
| National rank | #24,383of 32,066 US ZIPs Leads | #29,231of 32,066 US ZIPs |
| State rank | #303of 619 AL ZIPs | #855of 993 MO ZIPs |
| Metro rank | Not in a metro area | Not in a metro area |
ZipVitals Score — Composite of 9 scoring domainsNational rank, State rank and Metro rank — Among ZIPs with a computed score
Metro areas — 35765: not in a metro area · 63674: not in a metro area.
Where these ZIPs differ, domain by domain
Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score. Each one is placed on the same national scale, and the domains where these ZIPs are furthest apart come first. Higher is healthier in every one.
Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›
Every ranking, bar and gap below is measured against the same national group. Where a ZIP’s line also mentions its state or its metro area, that figure is measured against a different group — its own — so it is context for that one ZIP and never a comparison between them.
Furthest apart first
all 2 ZIPs can be placed on these 9 domains| 35765Pisgah | healthier than 22% · 54% in Alabama | 1 of 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63674Tiff | healthier than 6% · 6% in Missouri | 2 of 2 |
| 35765Pisgah | healthier than 21% · 37% in Alabama | 1 of 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63674Tiff | healthier than 6% · 9% in Missouri | 2 of 2 |
| 63674Tiff | healthier than 52% · 95% in Missouri | 1 of 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 35765Pisgah | healthier than 37% · 74% in Alabama | 2 of 2 |
| 35765Pisgah | healthier than 15% · 10% in Alabama | 1 of 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63674Tiff | healthier than 5% · 2% in Missouri | 2 of 2 |
| 35765Pisgah | healthier than 19% · 49% in Alabama | 1 of 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63674Tiff | healthier than 9% · 13% in Missouri | 2 of 2 |
| 35765Pisgah | healthier than 42% · 42% in Alabama | 1 of 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63674Tiff | healthier than 33% · 42% in Missouri | 2 of 2 |
| 35765Pisgah | healthier than 43% · 43% in Alabama | 1 of 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63674Tiff | healthier than 36% · 37% in Missouri | 2 of 2 |
| 35765Pisgah | healthier than 48% · 72% in Alabama | 1 of 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63674Tiff | healthier than 46% · 50% in Missouri | 2 of 2 |
| 35765Pisgah | healthier than 68% · 55% in Alabama | 1 of 2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63674Tiff | healthier than 67% · 62% in Missouri | 2 of 2 |
“Of the score” is the domain’s weight in the ZipVitals Score — a property of the score itself, the same on every ZIP. Not every ZIP sits in a metro area — those show a state figure only. A gap is the distance between the highest and lowest of these ZIPs on that domain’s national scale. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain.
Data release 2026 · higher is healthier on every row. How the ZipVitals Score is calculated →
The State rank and Metro rank rows show no “Leads” marker: each ZIP is ranked against the ZIPs in its own state and the ZIPs in its own metro area, so those ranks are not ordered against one another.
Share this comparison
This comparison has its own permalink and an auto-generated preview card — the image that unfurls when you paste the link into a message, post, or story.
ZipVitalsZipVitals Score · compare
Pisgah vs. Tiff
Data release 2026 · public federal and academic sources · higher is healthier