Insights & Rankings Compare

Compare ZIP codes side by side

Line up 2–5 ZIP codes and read the ZipVitals Score, both ranks, and every scoring domain against the same national scale. Descriptive of documented conditions — never a verdict on the people who live there.

Comparing29935Port Royal, SC41085Silver Grove, KY2–5 ZIPs · 2 selected

ZipVitals Score and its national and state ranks, compared across 2 ZIP codes. Higher is healthier. The nine scoring domains follow, one table each.
Metric	Port Royal29935 · SC	Silver Grove41085 · KY
ZipVitals ScoreComposite of 9 scoring domains	54.23 Leads	53.22
National rankAmong ZIPs with a computed score	#10,403of 32,066 US ZIPs Leads	#11,759of 32,066 US ZIPs
State rankAmong ZIPs with a computed score	#84of 417 SC ZIPs	#50of 742 KY ZIPs
Metro rankAmong ZIPs with a computed score	#10of 19 ZIPs in its metro area	#58of 156 ZIPs in its metro area

ZipVitals Score and its national and state ranks, compared across 2 ZIP codes. Higher is healthier. The nine scoring domains follow, one table each.
Metric	Port Royal29935 · SC	Silver Grove41085 · KY
ZipVitals Score	54.23 Leads	53.22
National rank	#10,403of 32,066 US ZIPs Leads	#11,759of 32,066 US ZIPs
State rank	#84of 417 SC ZIPs	#50of 742 KY ZIPs
Metro rank	#10of 19 ZIPs in its metro area	#58of 156 ZIPs in its metro area

ZipVitals Score — Composite of 9 scoring domainsNational rank, State rank and Metro rank — Among ZIPs with a computed score

Metro areas — 29935: Hilton Head Island-Bluffton-Port Royal, SC · 41085: Cincinnati, OH-KY-IN.

Where these ZIPs differ, domain by domain

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score. Each one is placed on the same national scale, and the domains where these ZIPs are furthest apart come first. Higher is healthier in every one.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Every ranking, bar and gap below is measured against the same national group. Where a ZIP’s line also mentions its state or its metro area, that figure is measured against a different group — its own — so it is context for that one ZIP and never a comparison between them.

Furthest apart first

all 2 ZIPs can be placed on these 5 domains

Healthcare Access5% of the score 29935 leads · 41-point gap
29935Port Royal		healthier than 90% · 89% in South Carolina, 94% in its metro area	1 of 2
41085Silver Grove		healthier than 49% · 0% in Kentucky, 20% in its metro area	2 of 2

Social Need / SDOH16% of the score 29935 leads · 25-point gap
29935Port Royal		healthier than 95% · 97% in South Carolina, 83% in its metro area	1 of 2
41085Silver Grove		healthier than 70% · 100% in Kentucky, 55% in its metro area	2 of 2

Environmental Hazard14% of the score 41085 leads · 8-point gap
41085Silver Grove		healthier than 64% · 100% in Kentucky, 94% in its metro area	1 of 2
29935Port Royal		healthier than 56% · 38% in South Carolina, 22% in its metro area	2 of 2

Preventive Care13% of the score 29935 leads · 1-point gap
29935Port Royal		healthier than 67% · 65% in South Carolina, 44% in its metro area	1 of 2
41085Silver GrovePartial		healthier than 66% · 100% in Kentucky, 51% in its metro area	2 of 2

Climate / Disaster Risk5% of the score 41085 leads · 1-point gap
41085Silver Grove		healthier than 4% · 0% in Kentucky, 0% in its metro area	1 of 2
29935Port Royal		healthier than 3% · 4% in South Carolina, 44% in its metro area	2 of 2

Not every ZIP can be placed here

no leader and no gap — ordered by weight instead

Chronic Disease Burden21% of the scoreno leader — 41085 cannot be placed here
29935Port Royal		healthier than 58% · 77% in South Carolina, 67% in its metro area	1 of 1
41085Silver Grove	not placed — too little of this domain is measured here to compare reliably, though it still counts toward this ZIP’s score

Risk Behavior11% of the scoreno leader — 41085 cannot be placed here
29935Port Royal		healthier than 67% · 81% in South Carolina, 44% in its metro area	1 of 1
41085Silver Grove	not placed — too little of this domain is measured here to compare reliably, though it still counts toward this ZIP’s score

Mental Health8% of the scoreno leader — 41085 cannot be placed here
29935Port Royal		healthier than 74% · 84% in South Carolina, 39% in its metro area	1 of 1
41085Silver Grove	not measured in this ZIP at all — left out of its score rather than estimated

Disability7% of the scoreno leader — 41085 cannot be placed here
29935Port Royal		healthier than 40% · 64% in South Carolina, 50% in its metro area	1 of 1
41085Silver Grove	not measured in this ZIP at all — left out of its score rather than estimated

“Of the score” is the domain’s weight in the ZipVitals Score — a property of the score itself, the same on every ZIP. Where a ZIP has no measurement for a domain, that domain drops out of its score and the remaining weights scale up, so its own mix differs slightly from the weights shown here; each ZIP’s own page carries its exact shares. A gap is the distance between the highest and lowest of these ZIPs on that domain’s national scale. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain.

Data release 2026 · higher is healthier on every row. How the ZipVitals Score is calculated →

The State rank and Metro rank rows show no “Leads” marker: each ZIP is ranked against the ZIPs in its own state and the ZIPs in its own metro area, so those ranks are not ordered against one another.

Share this comparison

This comparison has its own permalink and an auto-generated preview card — the image that unfurls when you paste the link into a message, post, or story.

ZipVitalsZipVitals Score · compare

Port Royal vs. Silver Grove

Port Royal 29935 · SCLEADS54.23

Silver Grove 41085 · KY53.22

Data release 2026 · public federal and academic sources · higher is healthier

Preview of the auto-generated share card · ZipVitals Score, 0–100