Insights & Rankings Compare

Compare ZIP codes side by side

Line up 2–5 ZIP codes and read the ZipVitals Score, both ranks, and every scoring domain against the same national scale. Descriptive of documented conditions — never a verdict on the people who live there.

Comparing29205Columbia, SC28027Concord, NC2–5 ZIPs · 2 selected

ZipVitals Score and its national and state ranks, compared across 2 ZIP codes. Higher is healthier. The nine scoring domains follow, one table each.
Metric	Columbia29205 · SC	Concord28027 · NC
ZipVitals ScoreComposite of 9 scoring domains	57.52	58.41 Leads
National rankAmong ZIPs with a computed score	#6,785of 32,066 US ZIPs	#6,066of 32,066 US ZIPs Leads
State rankAmong ZIPs with a computed score	#56of 417 SC ZIPs	#127of 793 NC ZIPs
Metro rankAmong ZIPs with a computed score	#9of 47 ZIPs in its metro area	#30of 113 ZIPs in its metro area

ZipVitals Score and its national and state ranks, compared across 2 ZIP codes. Higher is healthier. The nine scoring domains follow, one table each.
Metric	Columbia29205 · SC	Concord28027 · NC
ZipVitals Score	57.52	58.41 Leads
National rank	#6,785of 32,066 US ZIPs	#6,066of 32,066 US ZIPs Leads
State rank	#56of 417 SC ZIPs	#127of 793 NC ZIPs
Metro rank	#9of 47 ZIPs in its metro area	#30of 113 ZIPs in its metro area

ZipVitals Score — Composite of 9 scoring domainsNational rank, State rank and Metro rank — Among ZIPs with a computed score

Metro areas — 29205: Columbia, SC · 28027: Charlotte-Concord-Gastonia, NC-SC.

Where these ZIPs differ, domain by domain

Nine domains make up the ZipVitals Score. Each one is placed on the same national scale, and the domains where these ZIPs are furthest apart come first. Higher is healthier in every one.

Compared with the ZIP codes measured across all nine scoring domains — not with all US ZIP codes. How the score works, and who it compares you with ›

Every ranking, bar and gap below is measured against the same national group. Where a ZIP’s line also mentions its state or its metro area, that figure is measured against a different group — its own — so it is context for that one ZIP and never a comparison between them.

Furthest apart first

all 2 ZIPs can be placed on these 9 domains

Environmental Hazard14% of the score 28027 leads · 14-point gap
28027Concord		healthier than 20% · 8% in North Carolina, 22% in its metro area	1 of 2
29205Columbia		healthier than 6% · 6% in South Carolina, 4% in its metro area	2 of 2

Social Need / SDOH16% of the score 28027 leads · 9-point gap
28027Concord		healthier than 77% · 77% in North Carolina, 67% in its metro area	1 of 2
29205Columbia		healthier than 68% · 78% in South Carolina, 78% in its metro area	2 of 2

Risk Behavior11% of the score 28027 leads · 9-point gap
28027Concord		healthier than 80% · 76% in North Carolina, 76% in its metro area	1 of 2
29205Columbia		healthier than 71% · 83% in South Carolina, 83% in its metro area	2 of 2

Mental Health8% of the score 28027 leads · 8-point gap
28027Concord		healthier than 52% · 75% in North Carolina, 73% in its metro area	1 of 2
29205Columbia		healthier than 44% · 43% in South Carolina, 33% in its metro area	2 of 2

Healthcare Access5% of the score 29205 leads · 6-point gap
29205Columbia		healthier than 93% · 91% in South Carolina, 93% in its metro area	1 of 2
28027Concord		healthier than 87% · 86% in North Carolina, 77% in its metro area	2 of 2

Chronic Disease Burden21% of the score 29205 leads · 5-point gap
29205Columbia		healthier than 88% · 94% in South Carolina, 91% in its metro area	1 of 2
28027Concord		healthier than 83% · 89% in North Carolina, 73% in its metro area	2 of 2

Preventive Care13% of the score 29205 leads · 5-point gap
29205Columbia		healthier than 67% · 64% in South Carolina, 52% in its metro area	1 of 2
28027Concord		healthier than 62% · 50% in North Carolina, 63% in its metro area	2 of 2

Disability7% of the score 29205 leads · 2-point gap
29205Columbia		healthier than 79% · 91% in South Carolina, 85% in its metro area	1 of 2
28027Concord		healthier than 77% · 88% in North Carolina, 74% in its metro area	2 of 2

Climate / Disaster Risk5% of the scoretied — no single leader
29205Columbia		healthier than 33% · 58% in South Carolina, 70% in its metro area	=1 of 2
28027Concord		healthier than 33% · 32% in North Carolina, 16% in its metro area	=1 of 2

“Of the score” is the domain’s weight in the ZipVitals Score — a property of the score itself, the same on every ZIP. A gap is the distance between the highest and lowest of these ZIPs on that domain’s national scale. Percentages are rounded; higher is healthier in every domain.

Data release 2026 · higher is healthier on every row. How the ZipVitals Score is calculated →

The State rank and Metro rank rows show no “Leads” marker: each ZIP is ranked against the ZIPs in its own state and the ZIPs in its own metro area, so those ranks are not ordered against one another.

Share this comparison

This comparison has its own permalink and an auto-generated preview card — the image that unfurls when you paste the link into a message, post, or story.

ZipVitalsZipVitals Score · compare

Concord vs. Columbia

Concord 28027 · NCLEADS58.41

Columbia 29205 · SC57.52

Data release 2026 · public federal and academic sources · higher is healthier

Preview of the auto-generated share card · ZipVitals Score, 0–100